Case Outcome: Full Deposit Returned After RDSC Ruling
Understanding how the RDSC applies the evidence in a deposit dispute is more valuable than any legal textbook. This case outcome traces a real scenario — from withheld deposit to full return order — and highlights exactly which pieces of evidence made the difference.
Scenario
Background: A tenant vacated a furnished 1-bedroom in Dubai Marina after a 2-year tenancy. The security deposit was AED 8,500. The landlord retained the full deposit, claiming the sofa was damaged, the bedroom carpet was stained, and the property required professional cleaning. The tenant had a signed move-in handover report, photos taken on departure day, and a cleaning receipt. The case was filed at the RDSC.
The Example
Case Outcomes
CASE SUMMARY: Forum: Rental Disputes Settlement Centre (RDSC), Dubai Outcome: Full deposit return — AED 8,500 ordered Timeline: 47 days from filing to primary court ruling EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY TENANT: • Signed move-in handover report noting the sofa was already "worn in two areas" and the carpet had "pre-existing stain in northeast corner" • 47 timestamped photos taken at move-out on the departure date • Professional cleaning receipt for AED 600 from a licensed cleaning company, completed on departure date • Ejari tenancy certificate and contract • All correspondence with the landlord (WhatsApp and email) LANDLORD'S CLAIMS AND THE TRIBUNAL'S ASSESSMENT: Claim 1 — Sofa damage (AED 3,000): The landlord submitted photos of the worn sofa areas and a quote from a furniture shop for replacement. The RDSC judge noted that the move-in handover report had documented "worn areas" on the sofa at the start of the tenancy. The deduction was rejected — the damage predated the tenancy. Claim 2 — Carpet staining (AED 2,500): The landlord submitted a carpet replacement quote. The RDSC judge found that the move-in handover report documented a pre-existing stain in the same general area. Without clear photographic evidence showing significantly worse deterioration caused by the tenant beyond what was pre-existing, the deduction was rejected. Claim 3 — Professional cleaning (AED 500): The tenant produced a professional cleaning receipt for AED 600, obtained on the departure date. The RDSC judge found this demonstrated the tenant had left the property in a cleaned condition and rejected the landlord's cleaning claim. TOTAL DEPOSIT ORDERED RETURNED: AED 8,500 The landlord was also ordered to pay the tenant's RDSC filing fee of AED 297.50 (3.5% of the AED 8,500 deposit claim). KEY LESSONS FROM THIS OUTCOME: The case turned entirely on the signed move-in handover report. Had the report not documented the pre-existing sofa wear and carpet stain, the tenant would have had no defence to those specific claims. The professional cleaning receipt also proved decisive — a AED 600 investment eliminated a AED 500 deduction claim.
Why This Works
This outcome illustrates the central principle of deposit disputes: the landlord must prove the damage was caused by the tenant. A move-in report documenting pre-existing defects effectively shifts the burden back to the landlord — they must show the condition got worse, not simply that it's imperfect now.
The professional cleaning receipt is often overlooked by tenants as unnecessary documentation. But this case shows it serves a dual purpose: it proves the property was cleaned to professional standard AND it creates a challenge for the landlord to claim cleaning costs.
The RDSC's approach to the carpet stain — requiring 'significantly worse deterioration' beyond what was pre-existing — reflects the reasonable wear-and-tear standard. Tenants should understand this standard: it's not just about whether damage exists at check-out, but whether it's materially worse than what was documented at check-in.
The recovery of the filing fee from the losing landlord confirms that an RDSC win is not just about the deposit — the landlord bears the costs of unjustified retention.
Key Elements
- Pre-existing damage documented in move-in handover report — critical defence
- Timestamped departure-day photos showing property condition
- Professional cleaning receipt as proof of property condition at handover
- Full deposit plus filing fee awarded to tenant
- Case resolved in 47 days — faster than civil court
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Guides
Need help building your actual case?
Turn examples like this into your complete RDSC evidence package — in 30 minutes, based on official DLD guidelines.